|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newest Postings (click on the links where applicable)
Are some people within the justice and legal
aid system pulling strings behind the scenes to misappropriate funds from the
taxpayers of Ontario in a case involving Justice Craig Perkins?
(August
18, 2008) Renowned columnist with the National Post, Barbara Kay, has written an
excellent article about the same case which Court Watch has been following for
some time involving Justice Craig Perkins who sits in the Barrie and Newmarket
Courts in Ontario.
This case in which Justice Perkins placed a publication ban has taken a new twist. Now it seems as if the taxpayers of Ontario are going to get hosed for a lot of money. It seems that legal aid is going to fund the case in which the recipient mother of the legal aid lives very comfortably in a home where the combined income is in excess of $100,000 per year and where the recipient is reported to come from a very financially well off family. It is also estimated that this case could cost the taxpayer in excess of $100,000 to help the mother fight in court to prevent Justice Perkins gag order from being removed and to prevent her 12-year-old daughter to have contact with her older brothers and sister. The recipient mother has consistently refused to allow her 12 year old daughter to see her other siblings in spite of the child desperately wanting to do so. She misses her siblings dearly because of what Justice Perkins and her mother's lawyer have done to separate and destroy the family in Canada's morally corrupt family court system. In the eyes of many in the community, the mother who is the recipient of the legal aid is a child abuser of the worst kind as a result of the things that she has done to destroy her children's lives with the help and support of her family law lawyer. Yet it seems while many poor families are unable to get legal aid, this mother who would appear to be financially well off, gets significant funding. The father in this case has fought valiantly against an anti-father family court system and has fought tirelessly to pursue justice for his children, something which the courts seem unable to do.
Many who are familiar with the case believe that
the case is being funded by Legal Aid for political reasons because influential
people in the court system do not want the truth to come out about how this
family was mistreated by the justice system and how a young girl was stripped
away from her family without Justice Perkins ever asking what the girl wanted or
inquiring if her mother was abusing her. What is also interesting is that is has
been reported that the mother's lawyer is a director of Legal Aid and will get a
big chunk of this money from the taxpayer's purse. The conflict of
interest is so apparent. Justice Perkin's publication ban even makes it
impossible for the taxpayers of Ontario to know the name of the lawyer.
This whole case involving Justice Perkins has been a miscarriage of justice from
the very beginning and in the opinion of many, Justice Perkins should resign as
Judge. This case was the same case in which Justice Lydia Olah ordered the
courtroom doors to be UNLAWFULLY locked by OPP officers to keep members of the
media out of the court. Many citizens in Ontario feel that Justice Olah
and Justice Perkins have both acted like judicial tyrants and have brought the
Administration of Justice into disrepute. It would appear that Justice
Perkins along with some others in the legal industry have a vested interest in
seeing that the truth in this case is kept hidden from public scrutiny and
helping the mother with the use of legal aid resources would certainly help in
this goal without implicating those who really want the truth buried.
Link to
article in PDF format
Ontario Lawyer speaks out about the abuse of
citizens by law enforcement officials and the failure of the justice system to
protect Canadian citizens from this abuse
(August
13, 2008) Court Watch has posted a segment of an interview with a highly
respected and ethical lawyer in which he speaks about how a number of Canadian
citizens are being abused by law enforcement agencies while at the same time the
justice system is allowing this to happen. The justice system is failing
to protect Canadian citizens from abuse while at the same time protecting those
who commit the abuse. In the eyes of many Canadians, the authorities are failing
to protect the citizens that they have been entrusted to protect and instead,
protecting those who break the law. Many citizens feel that many in the
justice system have forgotten what true justice is about and have taken the
position that rather to serve and protect the citizens, to punish them.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Toronto CAS group home infested with
bedbugs!
(August 9, 2008) Court Watch has received inside information that a
Toronto region group home has been infested with bed bugs on intermittent basis
for over 18 months with the problem continuing as of today. It has been
reported that the children in care are being bitten while they sleep.
Children have had their personal belongings and clothing thrown out and are
being forced to sleep on the floor without blankets. The residence has
been sprayed numerous times but the bugs keep coming returning. Questions
can also be raised as to how much pesticide have the children been exposed to in
this CAS home after repeated spraying. If these conditions existed
in a private home, CAS would likely apprehend children from parents, yet when
these deplorable conditions exist within a taxpayer funded CAS facility, nothing
is done. Children report being threatened with punishment by CAS workers
if the children say anything to anyone about what they see going on in these
homes. Sounds like this CAS facility should be closed down permanently!
Fathers for Justice launch protest at the
Toronto office of Jack Layton
(August 8, 2008) Fathers for Justice have taken over the roof of the
Toronto constituency office of Jack Layton and have hung a banner reading, "No Dads
Party" in protest to what many claim is the anti-father policies and positions
of the New Democratic Party in Canada. Fathers for Canada has claim that
the New Democratic Party will not support equality and fairness in family law in
Canada and are treating fathers and sons as second class citizens. Toronto
Police and various news agencies have arrived at the scene.
Slain
girl 'failed' by the CAS system
(August 6, 2008) The death of seven-year-old Katelynn Sampson in Toronto
reveals yet another child death in a matter which supposedly involved the
Toronto Catholic Children's Aid Society? Are these CAS agencies ever
going to get it right?
Nine, including social workers, charged in
teen's death
(August
2, 2008)
A report from Associated Press about a teen
in the US who died from neglect while under the watchful eye of child protection
workers. Workers involved with the child's case are suspected of
falsifying home visit and progress report records. The Assistant Health
Commissioner, Carmen Paris, was suspected of interfering with the investigation
into the girl's death likely in an attempt to hide shoddy work by the workers
who were supposed to be supervising the girl and her family. Ms. Paris was
forced to resign her position.
Court Watch is aware of cases where CAS
workers are not visiting families in a timely manner as they are supposed to be.
Link to article in pdf format
Police seize children from mother who
kidnapped her children almost 6 1/2 years ago. Children now happy and
returning to Ontario with their father
(July 31, 2008) Breaking news. A father is on his way back to Ontario
today after police seized his children from their mother who had kidnapped them
from the Toronto Region and had taken them to the east coast of Canada where she
hid the children with the help of her family for years. She registered the
children in school using false names which the school local board never checked.
She never bothered to obtain health cards for the children and the mother worked
for cash to elude Revenue Canada. The children are reported doing good and
happy to now be with their father. The boy who was overjoyed to see his father
said, "I knew you were out there somewhere dad and knew that you would find me."
Hopefully the courts here in Ontario will send a message to this mother who kidnapped her children in contravention to a court Order. The mother has an extensive history of financial fraud and has been abusing the system for years with impunity.
Ontario Lawyer speaks to Court Watch regarding
the use of recording devices in the court as well as the tampering of
transcripts by judges and court reporters
(July
31, 2008) Court Watch has posted a segment of an interview with a highly
respected and ethical lawyer in which he speaks on the subject of recording your
own court hearing in Ontario as well as the problem with court transcripts being
unlawfully altered by judges and court staff.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Ding Dong the wicked witch is gone!
(July 30, 2008) While not having a house fall on her head as did happen to the wicked witch in the movie, "The Wizard of Oz", the one person who many referred to as Ontario’s wicked witch of family law, Ms. Clare Burns, is being moved out from the position as the Children's Lawyer of Ontario effective August 1, 2008.
link to article in pdf format
link to article in html format
Father reports how Ontario's Office of the
Children's Lawyer destroyed his children and adversly affected his life forever
as a result of a biased and incompetent report
(July 28, 2008) Another testimony in the continuing saga of abuse of children
and families by incompetent workers with Ontario's Office of the Children's
Lawyer, headed by Ms. Clare Burns, a lawyer who in contradiction to the Supreme
Court of Canada, believes that it it harmful to have workers with the Office of
the Children's Lawyer interview children on videotape. It's time for the
Government of Ontario to remove Ms. Burns from her position as the Children's
Lawyer. Court Watch continues to have complaints about her agency pour in.
She is the one who is the head of that organization and the one who should be
responsible for the lousy performance of her agency. Court Watch challenges
Clare Burns to start ordering her workers to videotape their interviews with
children. Why is it that Clare Burns and her band of lawyers and social
workers are so afraid of videotaping? Are they afraid of being held accountable?
Many citizens in Ontario are asking this same question.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Lawyer tells Court Watch that legal profession
has lost its moral compass is is working against the interest of the Canadian
people.
(July 27, 2008) Court Watch has interviewed a lawyer who has indicated that many
of those involved within the legal profession have loss their moral compass to
the point where justice in Canada is in disrepute. The legal system itself
is no longer serving to defend the citizens of this great country, but has
turned against the citizens of Canada using lawyers who want to pursue
convictions and guilty pleas at all costs using threats and intimation.
Stories of wrongfully convicted certainly support what this lawyer has reported
to Court Watch. In the opinion of this lawyer, there is one set of laws
for those in the system and a second set of laws for the Canadian people.
Many in the legal profession have put money and winning cases above justice.
Other honest and ethical legal professionals have contact Court Watch as well
and have indicated their willingness to speak publicly about how the legal
industry in Canada is failing the Canadian public. The video interview with this
lawyer to be posted soon. Readers who would like to keep updated to new
video releases should subscribe to the Court Watch Videos on www.vimeo.com/user387217/videos
Other lawyers, paralegals, court workers, CAS workers or other professionals who would also like to speak up about the failure of our legal or child protection system to serve the interests of Canadians are urged to contact Canada Court Watch at info@canadacourtwatch.com
Father reports extreme gender bias by Ontario
police. Police refuse to charge partner even when she admits having
assaulted the father and "liking" it.
(July 24, 2008) Court Watch will soon be posting another recent video in which a
father describes in detail how police in Ontario, including the police from
Halton Ontario, demonstrated blatant bias against him because of his gender.
Police refused to charge his drunken and violent wife after she busted down a
door and physically assaulted her husband leaving marks on him. According
to the father, Halton Police told him that if he called the police if his wife
was to assault him again, that he would be forcefully removed from his home
under Ontario's zero tolerance laws which mandate that the male must be removed
from his home and his children, even if the male is the victim of the assault.
In another incident, the police refused to press charges even after his drunken wife admitted to police that she had assaulted her husband in front of the children and "liked" doing it. This video will give yet another example of how police, operating under Ontario's draconian zero tolerance laws are literally destroying children and their families and breeding disrespect for the police by allowing many violent and abusive mothers to assault their partners and their children with impunity. Domestic violence statistics are being skewed to appear as if only men are the abusers because men in Ontario now live in constant fear of being removed from their homes and their children if they dare to call the police on their abusive partners. Some of the most shocking human rights abuses and abuse by police services against the citizens are going on right here in Canada.
Children report corruption and bias by
Ontario police against their loving and devoted father
(July 23, 2008) In this video, children disclose how they witnessed police
officers illegally seize tape recorded evidence from their father which
would have shown that the children's violent mother had been abusing the
children and then gave the evidence to the mother for her to destroy. They
then turned around and arrested the father and took him off to jail after
refusing to listen to the tape which would have shown that mom was lying to
police officers and that she was the one who was abusing both the kids and
the father. Unfortunately, bias against fathers by police is a big problem
in Ontario, with many, good and loving fathers being forced out of their
homes, taken from their children and then arrested and thrown in jail based
on false allegations from abusive and violent mothers.
A licensed private investigator's report in this same case was given to Court Watch also reveals that the mother in this case was observed by a private investigator inside an undercover police car on a remote rural Ontario road with one of officers from the local police force and appeared to have engaged in sexual activity. Was this payback to one of the police officers for letting mom destroy evidence which would have shown that she was abusing her children?
It's no wonder why the kids in Ontario are losing
respect for the police and the courts in Ontario. The kids are seeing for
themselves how corrupt Ontario's family law system has become and how good,
loving fathers are being destroyed by a system which supports mothers to the
point where many mothers are being allowed to abuse their family members with
impunity! Let's not forget the few good mothers who get screwed by the system as
well for similar reasons. It's time that police officers and CAS workers
be required to videotape interviews with children to lessen the ability of the
system to ignore and cover up what the kids are reporting. What are these
agencies afraid of? We need more honest cops and CAS workers to step up to
the plate and to help put an end to this sort of family destruction.
Corruption in the system is hurting our families, our communities, our
province and our Nation.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Former
CAS Board of Director states publicly: Accountability is required by
Children's Aid Societies!
(July 21, 2008) Former Board of Director member for one of Ontario's CAS
agencies, Larry Killens, has boldly stepped forward in the name of justice
and in a public letter written to MPP Mike Brown has stated that CAS
agencies in Ontario must be required to be more accountable. Mr.
Killens is one of a growing number of Ontario citizens who are now taking
action to correct what they see are major problems with the taxpayer funded
child protection system in Ontario.
Teens report that nobody, including the police,
the CAS or the court listened to them while their mother abused them and their
loving father for years
(July 20, 2008) A new video will soon be released in which three teens disclose
how they were miserably failed by the system in Ontario which ended up rewarding
their mother for abusing them and their father for years. They reported
abuse by their mother to the authorities but tell how nothing was done. In
fact, even after reporting that mother was abusing them, the children were put
in the custody of their abusive mother and forced to endure even more abuse.
Dad was forced into virtual poverty trying to protect his children and to seek
justice. Justice Perkins and Justice Lydia Olah of the Barrie, Ontario
court have done this as well - refused to listen to the kids about their abusive
mother and then put a publication ban on the case to hide what these judicial
tyrants did in that case.
Child reports her unpleasant experience
with Ontario's Office of the Chldren's Lawyer
(July 12, 2008) In a recent video interview,
a young child tells how Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer has
miserably failed her. This young girl reports how it took the lawyer
from the OCL almost a year to return her calls to his office. She
reports abuse by her stepmother to the OCL lawyer but who does nothing to
deal with the abuse. The girl reports how the Office of the children's
lawyer has done absolutely nothing to help her. The taxpayers of
Ontario are literally getting hosed by this government funded agency which
in many cases, is providing absolutely incompetent services to children.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Native
father questions CAS commitment to his child. CAS inaction tantamount
to co-conspiracy to child abuse
(July 9, 2008) A native father from the Whitefish River First Nation community
questions why the CAS has allowed his children to remain in the home of
their mother who has put the children in harm's way. The mother of the
children allowed a person who was charged with murder and banned for life
for having weapons to move in with her and the children. Yet, in spite of
this, in December of 2007, an incident occurred in which a gun was
discharged in the mother's home. There was a history of weapons and
violence in the mother's home, yet CAS would not provide any answers to the
children's father. As many in Ontario already know, CAS workers generally
are biased against fathers with children often being forced to live in
abusive environments. In some cases children are killed while living
with their mothers in spite of CAS monitoring the situation.
Conspiracy of Silence. Allowing the family courts and child protection
agencies to work in secret allows miscarriages of justice!
(July 7, 2008) As many Canadians already know, family courts and child
protection agencies (CAS in Ontario) do everything they can to maintain
secrecy. Workers with the CAS refuse to allow parents and even
children to audiotape meetings. CAS agencies often refuse to let
parents view files. Ontario's Office of the Children's lawyer say that
it is harmful to children to videotape interviews, in spite of children
complaining about the lawyers with the OCL lying to the court. The
public is kept out of child protection courts and even in public courts,
court workers often tell people outside in the hall that only those with
business in the court are allowed inside the "public" courts. Judges
like Justice Lydia Olah order the Ontario Provincial Police to illegally
padlock her court to keep people out. Judges like Craig Perkins order
publication bans to ensure that evidence is kept secret while he tells one
father that he cannot see his child until she is 18 years of age. All
this going on right here in Canada. Kids being ripped away from their homes,
their parents and siblings under veil of secrecy of Canadian courts while
unelected Judges give BS excuses in court to maintain secrecy and help
protect child protection agencies and their workers, most of whom in Ontario
are not even licensed social workers.
This article published in the times in the UK seems to reflect the same problems which the lawyers, the judges and the child protection workers have created right here in Canada. It's time for parents in Canada to start fighting back against this horribly out of control family court system.
As an example of this, view the latest video from a father who has not seen his two children in over two years as a result of the family courts and the CAS in Ontario. This father's children reported being physically abused by their mother so as a result, the children were punished by being taken away from their father. Even the neighbours next to the mother's home reported hearing the children being abused by their mother in Etobicoke, Ontario. Yet, the court and the CAS took the children away from their loving father and told him to pay $25,000 before he could even go back to court. It seems that in Canada one has to pay to even get access to justice. Another case of where an abusive and controlling mother gets the courts and the CAS to do whatever she wants.
Disgusting videotaped interview of Barrie,
Ontario child by the CAS
(July 3, 2008) A recently released video reveals disgusting work done by CAS
workers to a child from Barrie, Ontario in which one of the workers takes the
clothes off a young child at the CAS offices including her underwear so that the
CAS worker who has no medical credentials could do a vaginal examination.
Absolutely disgusting does not even begin to describe the intrusive and
unprofessional exam done on this child by some CAS worker! The child even
tells the worker that mommy told her to tell the worker that daddy touches her
private parts but the worker quickly diverts the child away from this disclosure
about her mom.
On top of this, the incompetent and stupid worker asks a bunch of leading and totally inappropriate questions clearly intended to get the child to say bad things about dad and to avoid asking questions about mom. Shame on you, CAS!!!!!! This video brings your agency to the pinnacle of child abuse! Who is watching these workers with the CAS? Obviously some of these CAS workers haven't the foggiest idea of how to conduct an interview with a child. Shame as well, on the judges in the Barrie, Ontario court such as Justice Olah and Justice Perkins who seem to believe much of what these CAS workers say without question. If Justice Olah or Justice Perkins would like to have a copy of this tape to see for themselves how CAS workers interview children and take their little panties down, then they are welcome to contact Court Watch and we will arrange to have a copy of the video delivered to them for their private viewing. While Justice Olah and Justice Perkins criticize Court Watch for its efforts to expose the truth and to help children, it's the CAS who are making fools of everyone at the court and making a mockery of justice! Court Watch has another video of a boy telling how a male CAS worker, stopped the CAS van at the side of the highway and then opened his trousers and grabbed his penis! Watch for that Court Watch video to be posted soon. It's a simple case of judges like Justice Olah and Justice Perkins backing the wrong horse in too many cases with tragic results for children. The CAS are going to make fools of both of these judges. It's no wonder why CAS agencies fight hard to keep these videos secret - they don't want to be scrutinized for their lack of professionalism! Justice Olah orders courtroom doors locked and Justice Perkins orders publication bans which certainly help these child-abusing CAS workers to hide their dirty secrets.
RCMP National Investigation unit reports that
CAS have acted inappropriately and have wrongly taken children!
(July 3, 2008) Documents recently released were reviewed by Court Watch
reporters today which clearly indicate that the RCMP at the highest level, did
conduct an investigation involving the CAS in Ontario and did conclude from
their investigation that the CAS had acted inappropriately and had wrongfully
taken away children from their parents. In addition to this, information has
been uncovered which would indicate that police at a local level where this
family lives kept this report a secret until the documents were eventually
uncovered. Thanks to the honestly of some good officers at the RCMP, the
CAS perpetrators of this crime may be brought to justice. A number of good
lawyers and police officers are now refusing to support a family court system
which even they see is out of control and unaccountable. It's only a
matter of time till many of these CAS workers who engage in criminal activities
are going to find themselves and their agencies facing big lawsuits as the truth
begins to surface of their wrongdoings.
Reign of terror in Barrie, Ontario as police
terrorize girl and her family as part of police goon squad assistance to
Children's Aid to "serve and protect" children and members of the public.
(July 3, 2008) A video posted on Youtube shows graphically how our tax dollars
are being spent by police and child protection workers in the Barrie, Ontario
region, to supposedly "protect" children from harm by forcing children to return
to the care of the Children's Aid Society. If anyone wonders why a growing
number of children and families in the community are beginning to hate the
police and the CAS, this video shows graphic reasons why.
This sort of public relations disaster created by police and the CAS is only destroying the public's faith in the police and the CAS. These organizations need the respect and support of the people of Barrie, not their disrespect and scorn. Another 13-year-old teen from Barrie contacted Court Watch to tell us how police broke down the bathroom door at her friend's home to take her away to the CAS after forcing her into the back of a smelly police cruiser. She had run back to her loving family after being sexually approached while in foster care with the CAS. CAS workers who often don't even have the credentials as social workers are in effect telling the police what do do. Police are often listening and taking orders from inexperienced CAS workers who often are not even registered Social Workers. This girl and her sibling you can be sure now hate the Barrie, Ontario police force as well and will be certainly sharing their views with many in the Barrie, Ontario region including other teens. Next time the Barrie, Ontario police have a riot and have kids jeering and making fun of them, they can blame their own policy of acting as the goon patrol for the CAS for turning the kids against them. What the police should be doing is insisting on Court Orders for apprehension rather than to take orders from unregistered CAS workers. Make the CAS workers get a court Order first and get it on the RECORD! Stop taking orders from these incompetent CAS workers who have a long history of messing up kids and their families.
Videos like this are helping to expose the truth
of the child protection industry in Canada. You don't need to go to third
world countries like China or South America to see children being terrorized and
taken away - we have the police and the CAS doing that right here in Canada.
If you think that human rights are being respected in Canada, you had better
think again. All this nonsense by the CAS being funded by the taxpayers of
the Province of Ontario, of course!
Link to
You Tube video
(Please note: CAS threatened the parents to remove the video and had it removed.
If this link does not work then stay tuned for a new link to the video)
And let's not forget as well, that it was
officers from the Barrie, Ontario police force who bullied and intimidated a 70
year-old senior citizen and would not let her enter the Barrie, Ontario
courthouse to use the public washrooms because the elderly woman was wearing a
Court Watch T shirt. Read the article at the link below. The police at the
Barrie, Ontario courthouse called her a "gang" member for protesting for justice
outside of the Barrie, Ontario court.
Link to Barrie Courthouse article in PDF format
Career
criminal claims his life in crime began right here in Ontario under the care
of the Chatham CAS!
(July 1, 2008) Placing children into the care of the Children's Aid
Society is one way of ensuring that those in the legal and law enforcement
industries will be ensured an ongoing supply of criminals to keep their
systems running at full tilt. A recent court case in London, Ontario
involving former CAS Crown Ward, Mervyn Breaton, supports what a recent
study out of British Columbia has shown - that kids placed in foster care
are more likely to be involved in a life of crime than they are to go to
school. The 87 year-old Breaton appeared before Justice Ross Webster in
London, Ontario on charges relating to drugs and breach of probation.
Breaton said his history of being involved in crime began after he was
placed into the care of Children's Aid Society in Chatham as a child.
Braeton said that since the time he was placed in the care of the CAS that
crime and jails is all that he has ever known. "They threw me into
Children's Aid and from then on it was one jail to another," he said.
For
kids in care of child protection agencies, jail a more likely future than
graduation!
(June 27, 2008) A study conducted by the provincial government in
British Columbia has revealed troubling findings which show that children in
care of child protection agencies are more likely to end up in jail than to
graduate from school. This article compliments the article published by
Canada Court Watch of June 27, 2008 which deals with the issue of kids
running wild without supervision in many CAS agencies and that many kids are
being corrupted by the influences they face when in care of the CAS.
In many cases, the actions of CAS agencies is akin taking kids out of the
frying pan and then throwing them into the fire!
|
|
Teenage
girls turning to prostitution and delinquency while in care of Children's Aid
Society in Ontario |
Hamilton
MPP introduces Ombudsman oversight bill to make CAS more accountable!
)June 18,
2008) Hamilton NDP MPP Andrea Horwath MPP has re-introduced the CAS
Ombudsman Oversight Bill, which, if passed, will grant the Ontario
Ombudsman, Andre Marin, the right to finally have the power to investigate
the actions of Children's Aid Societies within the
The Child & Family Services Review Board was introduced to the general
public as what was supposed to be the independent investigative body that
would ensure that children were protected from this point on, and that, on
the rare occasion when mistakes were made, the CFSRB would be there to "fix"
what went wrong. The
CFSRB's role, however, became so watered down during its establishment that
the Board really does not now have any investigative powers whatsoever. The
only power that the CFSRB actually has - as admitted to by the CFSRB itself
- is to compel the complained-about CAS agency to put in writing the reason
for their decision on a given matter. There is absolutely no oversight over
CAS agencies at all - even with the CFSRB in place - despite Minister of
Children & Youth Services Deb Matthews' false allegations to the contrary.
The offending CAS agency can still rob parents of their children - and
children of their parents - inappropriately and illegally. The CAS agencies
can still destroy lives and lie in affidavits, which they do repeatedly
without penalty.
Parents are urged to contact their MPP's and to request that support Andrea Horwath's Bill. Parents can also help by obtaining a copy of a petition form from Andrea and collect signatures. We can no longer allow CAS agencies to continue to be unaccountable any longer. All of our children are counting on it."
Simcoe Children's Aid Society accepts psychic's
prediction as basis to commence sexual abuse investigation!
(June 17, 2008) If the latest news out of Barrie is any indication of what what
CAS agencies have added to their risk assessment tools, CAS agencies should soon
be regularly making front page news in the National Enquirer! It seems
that the bumbling idiots from the Simcoe Children's Aid Society (most of whom
are unlicensed social workers) commenced an investigation into child abuse based
on the reports of a local psychic and card reader. Check today's top news
stories in various newspapers. We can expect that the Simcoe Children's
Aid Society will soon be hiring its own psychics, card readers and witchdoctors. What's next? Will
the Simcoe CAS start a new department to
begin investigations of sexual abuse of Aliens from Outer Space? Risk Assessment
tools for green children from outer space could very well be the next project coming from
the Barrie, Ontario Region if this latest incident is any indication of the
thinking that goes on with workers at the CAS. The real tragedy is that the Province of
Ontario is taking money away from schools and hospitals in order to fund
this CAS nonsense. BEFORE any investigation even commences or a file is even
opened up, CAS workers should be verifying the source of the information.
In this case with information coming from a psychic as the source, school
officials and CAS workers should simply have hung up the phone before taking any
further action. The school worker who went to the psychic in the first place
should be fired for being mentally unfit to care for children.
Internationally acclaimed Canadian scientist to
speak about abuse of children and families by Canada's family court system!
(June 10, 2008) One of Canada's highly acclaimed and internationally recognized
scientists has contacted Court Watch and has indicated that he is willing to
come forth publicly and speak about what he has seen is the systemic abuse of
children and families by Canada's morally corrupt family court system. His
testimony will soon be spread throughout the world how the legal profession
together with the courts in Canada are helping to destroy their own citizens.
Readers should stay tuned for when Court Watch breaks this new story.
According to this highly respected scientist, the family court system is
creating unnecessary work for lawyers and failing to serve the interest of the
Canadian people.
Ontario judge grants recess in court to allows
party to purchase recording device and to bring it back into the courtroom!
(June 3, 2008) One Ontario Court judge has demonstrated that he has the
fortitude and respect for justice to boldly step where few other judges would
dare to tread. In court, the judge acknowledged that a party appearing in
court had the right to record his own court hearing. The judge was then so
gracious as to grant a recess for the party to leave the courtroom to purchase a
recording device at a local electronics shop and to bring back into court.
At a previous hearing, the judge admitted that after over 20 years of the bench,
he was not familiar with section 136 of the Courts of Justice Act which allows
recording and had told the party at the first hearing that recording would not
be allowed. At the second hearing, however, the judge did not dig in his
heels, but honourably admitted his previous error and to make amends, allowed
the party to obtain a recording device at a local store and to bring it back to
the court. An article with full details will be published. Hats off
to this judge who not only showed that judges are human and that they can make
mistakes too, but showed that he was going to put justice and the law above even
his own pride! It's the actions of judges like this who help restore the
public's respect in the administration of Justice. We need more judges
like this who understand that they are working to serve the people of Canada in
the interests of justice.
It's too bad that more of our other judges would not follow the example of this judge. Justice Craig Perkins and Justice Lydia Olah are some of these judges who, by their actions, have demonstrated contempt of the law. Justice Lydia Olah had OPP officers from the Collingwood detachment of the OPP physically lock courtroom doors with a lock and key at her court in Collingwood, Ontario and Justice Craig Perkins appears to have made arrangements to have his own court Order violated by certain firms who publish case law. Many argue that the time has come for elections for judges so that the people of Canada can weed out those judges who work against the fundamental principles of justice. Just like a garden needs to be weeded out, Canadians need the ability to weed out those in the judiciary who fail to serve the true interests of justice.
Mother testifies about her family's horrible
ordeal with Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer!
(June 3, 2008) A mother has come forth to speak about her horrible experience
with Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer. This is only yet another in the
series of videos intended to expose Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer
for failing to live up to it's mandate to properly protect many children.
Hopefully, this will motivate Claire Burns, the Children's Lawyer, to introduce
some much needed changes, such as requiring interviews between children and
workers to be videotaped.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Child Protection worker caught with
drugs in vehicle while transporting foster child
(May 28, 2008) From CBC News -
An employee of West
Region Child and Family Services is on paid leave and facing criminal charges in
connection with drugs found in a vehicle. RCMP said
they stopped a car not far from Winnipeg on May 21 and found nearly half a
kilogram of marijuana in it. One of two men in the vehicle was an employee
of West Region Child and Family Services. A 13-year-old foster child was also in
the car. (Maybe this is where some of the workers from the Hamilton CAS
get their illegal drugs from.
Link to
Hamilton CAS article)
Link to CBC news Article
Teen speaks up about how kid's are being
drugged up while in CAS approved foster homes!
(May 25, 2008) A teen speaks up about how kids in foster care were pumped up
with drugs until they were zombies and then go downhill after that. She
witnessed kids go from good to bad once CAS workers put the kids on prescription
drugs. A chilling testimony of just how things are really like in a CAS foster
home.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Government may compensate foster-home victims!
(May 30, 2008)
An article written in the Sun Media regarding how the government of
Manitoba is considering a compensation package and apology for the
many, many children who were abused while in the care of child
protection services in that Province. Seems as if these child
protection agencies just cant get it right, not matter how much
funding they get.
It would seem that there is a problem in Ontario as well and even more current as the below links from children testify. The links below are very recent situations as well.
Christmas at an Ontario CAS approved foster
home!
(May 28 2008) A teen speaks up about her experience at Christmas along with
three other foster kids. Locked in a damp and cold basement, this girl
along with three other teens was made to stay in the basement while the CAS
foster family ate turkey dinner and shared Christmas upstairs. She was
also told by CAS workers that she was not allowed to call her mother or her
family at Christmas. This video is a just a short clip from an extensive
interview in which the girl discloses beatings of kids by CAS providers,
psychological abuse and drugs being forced on kids in care. She describes
many times, how abuse is reported to CAS workers but workers turn their backs on
the kids and do nothing. The more comprehensive video interview will be
posted in the near future with high quality DVD copies available from Court
Watch. The full length DVD video could be used as a resource by parents to take
to their MPP's and MP's and also to give as evidence in CAS court cases to show
that CAS is not a safe place for children.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Teen speaks up about her experience with
Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer!
(May 25, 2008) A teen speaks up about her experience with Ontario's Office of
the Children's Lawyer. Her testimony is typical of the type of feedback
that children are reporting about the Office of the Children's Lawyer.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Mother and Daughter claim that they waited for
almost a year to get a return call from the Children's Lawyer and still after
more than 1 1/2 years absolutely nothing constructive has resulted!
(May 19, 2008) In response to our call for witnesses, a mother and daughter have
come forth to complain about what they say is their "horrible" experience with
Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer headed by Ms. Claire Burns. In
their situation, it took almost a year from when the case was assigned for the
children's lawyer to return their phone calls and even then it was only after
the mother sent a complaint letter to head office did the lawyer call them back
(in 3 hours after the complaint letter). But even after the lawyer called
them back, nothing effective ever got done after that. Both the mother and
the daughter say that the Office of the Children's Lawyer had done absolutely
nothing to help them in almost 19 months. The girl even tried to fire her
Children's Lawyer but the Children's Lawyer's Office refused the girl's request.
How's that for service to the children of Ontario!
While Ms. Claire Burns spouts off in court in an effort to denigrate Court Watch and to stop Court Watch from observing her agency in court, she forgets that many of the children who her agency has provided lousy services are voluntarily coming to Court Watch to tell how the agency she heads has failed them. These parents and their children want their stories heard about how the lawyers have miserably failed them. There is an old saying, those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. It is time for Ms. Claire Burns to come out of her glass tower on University Ave, step up to the plate and to do her job as head of the Children's Lawyer Office by implementing a few simple procedures which would stop these sorts of situations from happening in the first place. Video interviews with this mother and her daughter will be posted soon. Court Watch does not wish to embarrass the Office of the Children's Lawyer, but sometimes this is the only way to get positive changes implemented. Court Watch only wants the Office of the Children's Lawyer to work in an accountable, transparent and professional manner in the interest of children and families in Ontario.
In this day and age of inexpensive recording devices, there is no reason whatsoever for children and parents to be contacting Court Watch to report that they have been threatened and abused by their children's lawyer while in meetings. Court Watch manages to provide videotape service with no money coming from the taxpayers, so why can't Ms. Burns's agency do the same with the millions of tax dollars it receives every year from the Ontario government! There should be no reason for children reporting that their Children's lawyer is lying about what they have said. There should be no reason why children are reporting physical abuse to their lawyer and then have the lawyer do nothing about it! THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS WHATSOEVER! If Claire Burns, as the Children's Lawyer of Ontario, does not take steps to fix the problem of selective reporting, then she is part of the problem herself and in the public's interest, Court Watch will do its part to expose injustices committed against children by her agency. If changes don't come soon, a public inquiry may be the solution.
The Archbishop Dorian A. Baxter, the National
Chairman of Court Watch, stands ready to meet with Ms. Burns to discuss how her
agency can begin to make positive changes which will better serve the children
of Ontario. One thing we can predict for certain, that unless Claire Burns
takes her duty to serve the citizens of Ontario seriously and takes positive steps soon to fix the sorts of
problems that Court Watch had uncovered, that it will be only a matter of time until our elected officials will
decide to have her replaced with someone who will get the job done with far
fewer of these sorts of unnecessary and easily avoidable complaints.
Link to video to be posted here soon
Information wanted from children and parents
about their experience with Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer!
(May 17, 2008) In a recent court hearing, Ms. Claire Burns, the Children's
Lawyer of Ontario, personally intervened and attempted to discredit Canada Court
Watch by claiming that Court Watch should not be allowed to monitor child
protection cases in the courts and that Court Watch should not be considered as
a media source for getting information out to the public. By her actions,
Mr. Burns has only demonstrated that her agency is more worried about protecting
the interests of its lawyers than it is interested in promoting accountability
and transparency which are some of most basic principles encompassed within the
meaning of "the Administration of Justice." Court Watch has a copy of a
video from the Law Society of Upper Canada in which Ms. Burns has stated on the
public record that her office has determined that the recording of children by
their children's lawyers can psychologically harm them. Yet, the Supreme
Court of Canada has contradicted the position of Ms. Burns and has said that the
video recording of children is a reliable source of evidence. (Canada Court
Watch supports the position that interviews between children and professionals
in any matter which could have a significant impact on a child or family must be
recorded using audio or video)
Ms. Burns, representing the Office of the Children's Lawyer, takes the position that her government funded agency is a reliable source for providing services for children and that organizations such as Canada Court Watch should not be allowed to monitor how the Children's Lawyer's Office does its job at the expense of taxpayers. What Ms. Burns failed to mention is that her agency had previously argued this same position in the past and at a court hearing where lawyers with the Office of the Children's Lawyer were given time by the judge to present their arguments and where Court Watch was given a fair opportunity to present it's arguments, that the lawyers with the Office of the Children's Lawyer and the Children's Aid were defeated in court by a single Canada Court Watch reporter. This is not the first time that the Children's Lawyer's office has attempted to pervert the administration of justice and to keep Canada Court Watch from monitoring how its agency represents children in Ontario. It would seem that Claire Burns does not support a fair process when it comes to dealing with those who monitor her agency. There is an old expression in the English language with says, "what is good for the goose is good for the gander" so as a public figure, Ms. Burns must be prepared for what members of the public have to say about how her agency is performing in the public's interest. Court Watch has received many complaints from children about their distrust of the court appointed Children's Lawyer. Children have testified that their court appointed children's lawyer has lied to the court about what they are saying and that they don't trust their children's lawyers. This being the case, why is Ms. Claire Burns so opposed to having her worker maintain an accurate record of meetings with children by simply audio recording them? And what about the psychological damage to children as Ms. Burns claims - hogwash say many parents and children!!
A previous report Link to report released by a committee of citizens about the Children's Lawyer on just one case, provides some evidence as to the poor job this agency has done in the past. This report which was produced by the citizens of Ontario at no cost to the taxpayers, resulted in the Office of the Children's Lawyer being hauled before the Divisional Court In Toronto and harshly criticized by the court. This is a good example of how the citizens of Ontario can fight back and make a difference! Recent video testimony from a mother gives some more indication of how some children and parents feel about this government funded agency and that problems continue to exist with this agency. Link to video
Canada Court Watch feels that it is time for children and parents of Ontario who have had dealings with Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer, to have their say so that the elected officials of the Province of Ontario can know how the Children's Lawyer is performing under its mandate. Court Watch would like to gather testimony and other evidence from children and parents who have had dealings with the Office of the Children's Lawyer for the purpose of producing an investigative report on this agency. We are looking for video interviews with children and parents as well as court documents which will show how the Children's Lawyer has performed in various Ontario court cases. We want the names of individual lawyers who have worked as children's lawyers and we want feedback as to how well they performed. Testimony from mature children and teens will be most helpful. Whether a good or bad experience, Court Watch would like to hear from you. If you are interested in providing information or testimony in support of this effort, please contact Canada Court Watch at info@canadacourtwatch.com
Women's
Shelter supervisor reports abuse of tax dollars by women's shelter!
(May 16, 2008)
A women's shelter supervisor contacted Canada Court Watch to disclose that
she has witnessed considerable problems within the women's shelter where she
works and that there are many things that she has seen which she does not
feel are right but unable to say anything publicly about due to fear of
losing her job at the shelter for abused women. During her interview
she disclosed that records were being altered and that the shelter for
abused women was taking in many women of questionable background for the
sole purpose of maintaining higher levels of government funding from the
Province of Ontario. She indicated that violence was occurring in the
shelter and that homeless people, people on drugs and violent women were
being allowed into the facility in the presence of children without question
in order to maintain higher levels of funding from the Ontario government.
Many would say that it is about time that standardized intake forms and
policies be imposed on all abused women's shelters in Ontario which would
help to reduce these systemic abuses of women and children who come to
women's shelters looking for help. Court Watch has a list of
recommendations which would have eliminated this caller's concerns if
implemented by the government of Ontario.
Link to position statement
Recent video
testimony from parents and children support what this supervisor has
reported to Court Watch
Link to mother's testimony
Link to mother's testimony
Link
to child's testimony
Teen speaks up about her experience under the
care of the Children's Aid Society!
(May 15, 2008) A teen speaks up about her experience as a child living under the
care of the CAS in Ontario. This girl says that she suffered 2 1/3 years
of physical beatings by her foster mother while under the care of the CAS and
workers would not listen to her. Her tragic story is typical of the many
horror stories from children raised in the care of child protection services in
Ontario. Its no wonder why children who have been in care are growing up
to have a deep distrust of child protection workers and the agencies they work
for.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Teen claims that CAS foster mother with the
Halton Children's Aid Society broke the law and encouraged foster children in
her care to break the law as well - video now on line!
(May 11, 2008)
A child involved with the CAS has described during a videotaped interview how
the CAS mother broke the law by providing cigarettes to teens in her care and
then encouraged the teens to break the law themselves by sending them to the
store to purchase cigarettes for her when they were underage. This teen
says that what the CAS foster mother did was wrong and that it encouraged those
kids in the care of this Halton CAS foster mother to smoke. Here we have
laws in the Province of Ontario to protect children from smoking, yet we put the
kids in care of an agency which is supposed to "protect" children and it is
actions of the child protection agency and its workers which are the ones who
are failing to protect children and putting them in harms way.
Link to Court
Watch video index
How CAS workers manipulate children in a
campaign to harm fathers and protect mothers who abuse their children - video
now on line!
(May 5, 2008)
A child involved with the CAS has described during a videotaped interview with
Court Watch how CAS workers from Ontario asked her leading and suggestive
questions in an attempt to make her father look bad while trying to paint the
mother as a good mother. Yet the child was being abused by her mother, not
the father. According to this girl, CAS workers totally disregarded abuse
by her mother. This latest video supports what many children and parents
have been reporting to Court Watch about the bias against fathers being shown by
many CAS workers. Court Watch has received complaints from other families
about the same CAS agencies which this girl was involved with. Court Watch has
advocated for years that CAS workers must record their interviews with children,
yet CAS agencies refuse to do this because they very well know that many of
their child protection files are based on misleading and fabricated evidence.
If this is not the case, then why are CAS workers and agencies afraid of
recording devices?
Link to Court
Watch video index
Foster kid spill the beans! Halton Children's
Aid Society worker gives cigaretts to underage children and then smokes up with
them!
(April 26, 2008)
A ward of the Halton CAS has come forth and during a videotaped interview
disclosed to Court Watch that children as young as 14 were being given
cigarettes and then allowed to smoke them along with the Halton CAS worker who
told the children to keep this a little secret between themselves.
According to society ward, the CAS worker involved was having the under-aged
children purchase cigarettes at the local store and bring them back for the the
CAS worker and the kids to smoke together. In addition to the smoking, the
foster child told of crying in bed at night because of all the broken promises
by workers and the constant pressure put on the children by the Halton CAS
workers. Another foster child came forth not that long ago to disclose
abuse by workers with the Halton CAS. That child as well voiced similar
complaints. During her interview, the child who is now a teen, disclosed
of other abuses by CAS workers. The teen referred to CAS workers as liars
and manipulators who could not be trusted. Children are being abused by
CAS workers and agencies and now these unaccountable CAS agencies are demanding
yet even more money from the Ontario Government.
The Untold Story and Gender Politics behind
Ontario's Hadley Murder-Suicide
(April 24, 2008)
Watch the video presentation of well respected Canadian criminal lawyer, Walter
Fox, while he speaks about some of the gender based politics that went on during
the Hadley murder-suicide inquest in Ontario. Hear about some of the
tricks that women's shelter advocates do not want members of the public to know
about when it comes to how men are treated by the system in Ontario. Ontario is
not a friendly place for men.
Link to Court
Watch video index
Barrie, Ontario Rally 2008 - Pre-Register Now!
(April 21, 2008)
Citizens from the Barrie, Ontario Region are getting ready for their third
annual public awareness event and barbecue to be held sometime this summer
during the months of July or August in Barrie, Ontario. The event is
intended to bring public awareness of the injustices being perpetrated against
families by the family court system and the Children's Aid Society. The
last two years have been a great success. Justice Craig Perkins of the
Barrie, Ontario court along with some other Justices such as Justice Lydia Olah
have caused the citizens of Ontario great concern by their apparent lack of
respect for the Law and their lack of accountability to the community.
Justice Craig Perkins likes to encourage people to violate his own court Orders
and Justice Lydia Olah likes to have the Ontario Provincial Police lock the
doors to her court in order to keep matters secret. If you would like to
pre-register for this event and to get your name on our contact list, please go
to our registration sheet. Many parents are aware of the dismal record of
the CAS and the things that the various CAS agencies do to keep their workers
unaccountable.
Pre-Registration information form
|
Ontario Justice Bruce Pugsley's recent comments in family court Have your say! In a recent family court decision, Ontario Court Justice Bruce Pugsley criticized a parent for using a recording device to record some of the inappropriate and disgusting comments that the other parent had made after their breakup. In court, Justice Pugsley stated, "Surreptitious recording to telephone calls by litigants in family law matters should be strongly discouraged. There is already enough conflict and mistrust in family law cases, without the parties worrying about whether the other is secretly taping them...." Justice Pugsley's comments would suggest that he believes recording can only achieve negative results - to make matters worse between parents with no positive benefits. Justice Pugley's comments would suggest that somehow separated parents will work more cooperatively if they are assured that what they say or do is not being recorded by the other side. Based on Justice Pugsley's comments, those in the legal profession could begin to use Justice Pugsley's logic to argue that it will cause stress as well to record those high paid CAS workers, police and other court related professionals who are known to obstruct justice and lie to the courts from time to time. If it is to the benefit of parents not to do things which may aggravate the other, then why do the courts and all the lawyers support the ADVERSARIAL family court system and force parents there in the first place. Why is it that the lawyers engage the other side using exaggerated court documents and false allegations. Seems like those in the legal system speak out of both sides of their mouths at the same time To the contrary of Justice Pugsly's statement, many parents claim that they have been innocent victims of false allegations by another parent and feel that recording of phone calls and personal exchanges is one of the most reliable ways in which to protect themselves from false allegations. Some parents have reported to Court Watch that the use of recording devices has been so instrumental in their matter, that in some cases the practice has successfully prevented them from being arrested and thrown in jail because of false allegations made by another parent or their supporters. Some parents feel that in the environment of family courts where it is one party's word against the other, recording is the only way to accurately record past events when parties give conflicting stories. The National Chairman of Canada Court Watch, the Archbishop Dorian A. Baxter, used hidden recording devices to catch children's Aid Society workers in the act of extortion and perjury. In many cases, recordings of children being abused have been instrumental in ending the abuse of children. Many citizens would say that no reasonable person should object to being recorded as those who are acting in a respectful manner and within the law should have nothing to hide and should not be afraid of recording anything they may say or do. Only those who have something to hide would object to being recorded. It is acknowledged even by family court judges that perjury is rampant in family court and that in this day of small personal recording devices, that everyone should benefit from the security of such devices if that is their choice. Many believe that recordings will help reduce the devastation caused by false allegations and that overall, the benefits and protections offered by recording devices, far outweigh arguments which claim that the unobtrusive recording of another party increases conflict. From a more legal perspective, Justice Pugsley's statement would appear to have him making statements which would be considered as being outside of his jurisdiction as a judge. This is a no-no. First of all it is perfectly legal in Canada to record one's own communication with another person. Justice Pugsley should not be making negative comments on actions of individuals which are considered fully within the law. He should remain silent on this issue in his court. Also under Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, individuals have the right to take whatever reasonable measures they feel necessary to protect the "security of their person". In a family court environment where perjury is rampant and accepted by the judges, most litigants feel that they must resort to the use of recording devices to protect themselves. For Justice Pugsley to even suggest that parents must give up their lawful rights to protect themselves from lies and perjury is totally wrong and shows utter disregard to Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms and utter disregard to the rights of citizens to protect themselves from harm. Many
citizens would say that Justice Pugsley's comments in his court are just another example of
how Judges and the legal system in general are trying to stop the growing use of recording devices because
the use of such devices poses a threat to the legal system by promoting
accountability and transparency. Recordings
will reduce the ability of lawyers to argue about the truth in court and therefore
lessen the amount of money that lawyers can charge . Video and audio
surveillance is proving to be one of the best protections against
crime and wrongdoings by individuals, so why is it that Justice Pugsley and some of his fellow judges
are so opposed to its use? On what planet do some of these judges live
on to come up with these sorts of conclusions? There is likely no body
of credible evidence to support Justice Pugsley's comments which now
has proudly become precedent setting case law in the Province of
Ontario. Some would say this is yet another example of Judge made
law and just another reason why Canadians need to have elected judges so
that they can get rid of the ones whose judgments make no sense! |
Teen beaten up by other girls
(April 8, 2008)
Zero tolerance domestic violence policies paint most men in Ontario as abusers
and women as victims. Here is a link to a video which shows some of the
truth about violence by women.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=a-YDgAG6tCM
Lawyers gone bad! Sex and Madness in Canada's
legal profession
(April 8, 2008)
Every week Court Watch advocates in various areas receive complaints about
lawyers. Poor services, high prices and often unethical practice.
Meet Philip Slayton, Rhodes Scholar, former corporate lawyer and Dean of Law, discuss his book, book, Lawyers Gone Bad: Money, Sex and Madness in Canada's Legal Profession. Question and answer to follow. Wednesday, Apr. 9, 7 p.m. - North York Central, Auditorium. Call the Library for registration at 416-395-5639.
Young girl's testimony about her experience in
an Ontario women's shelter
(April 5, 2008)
If any doubts linger about what the previous two women's shelter videos reveal
about what is really going on inside some of Ontario's women's shelters, then
this next video will support what those mothers said but from the perspective of
a child. In this video, the child reports being exposed to violence and
abuse inside the shelter and that she was forced to watch movies which showed
men beating up women and then the bruised women going to women's shelters.
These women's shelters are indoctrinating children into believing that only men
are abusers and that women are victims.
The child said that it was not fair that they
were denied access to her loving father and that she hated being forced to stay
in the women's shelter. It would appear that not only are tax dollars
being used to abuse women at these shelters but their children as well!
Link
to video
One father's experience with altered court transcripts and his advice about the use of audio recording devices!
(March 31, 2008)
In this video a father from Ontario tells about his experience with the
Ontario courts and the court's transcription services. According to
this father, the court transcripts in his case were altered and that the
company who did the transcripts went to great lengths to cover up the
tampering. An increasing number of families in Ontario are complaining
about court transcripts being altered. Citizens must protect
themselves using hidden audio recording devices outside of the court and to
record their court hearings when inside!
Link to Court
Watch video index
Law enforcement officer provides evidence to Court Watch to support incompetent and bias decision by Justice Craig Perkins!
(March 28, 2008) In follow-up to the post of March 14, 2008, documents have now been delivered to Court Watch which would reasonably support claims that Justice Craig Perkins of the Newmarket, Ontario court failed to promote justice and made an incompetent and bias court ruling in support of a woman in a family law matter. His decision in this case has adversely affected a father and his children and at the time of his decision put other citizens in the community at risk because of the fraud and deception being perpetrated by the mother with the support of Justice Perkin's ruling.
The documents reveal how Justice Perkins had the wool pulled over his eyes and totally fell prey to a women's lies and deceptions which hurt yet another family without even giving the opportunity for the father to appear in his court. To have prevented this fraud on the community, Justice Perkins simply had to tell the mother to serve documents on the father so that he could be given the opportunity to be in court as well so at least Justice Perkins could hear both side. But Justice Perkins did not and went ahead and listened to the mother's side only.
There is no publication ban as there is in another case which Justice Perkins badly messed up on by not even asking what the wishes of a 10-year-old child before he separated permanently from her loving family. It would seem that Justice Perkins has a bad habit of making decisions without ensuring that he has all the evidence before him. Charges for obstruction of Justice will be requested in this case. Only time will tell if judges like Justice Perkins are interested in making parties (including lawyers) who mislead the courts accountable for their actions. One of the reasons why lies and perjury has become rampant is because the courts do nothing to those who get caught lying. Many c